Defending Quantum Computing’s Challenges
Defending Quantum Computing’s Challenges. Perhaps because Jim Clarke, Director of Quantum Hardware for Intel, reads The Qubit Report, he knows that there are “big” challenges
Defending Quantum Computing’s Challenges. Perhaps because Jim Clarke, Director of Quantum Hardware for Intel, reads The Qubit Report, he knows that there are “big” challenges
Technical Problems Identified as Hindrance to Quantum Computing Advancement. Security and privacy disaster awaits if technical hurdles to quantum computer development are overcome. Hurdles identified are
Though quantum computers have yet to become reality, there are a number of basic facts one should understand…
Decoherence is a grind on the effort to move quantum computing forward. Efforts to overcome decoherence, the loss of a coherent state, is a field of much research. Scientists at MIT have published a method to help resolve part of the issue which is a failing to correct the dominant noise type in quantum sensors. Their method exploits spatial correlations involving qubits and tailors the error-corrections to the “noise” vice temporal correlations between signal properties and noise.
Australia, in collaboration with U.S.A.’s Purdue University, surged forward with controlling qubits individually on silicon chips. The ability to control qubits singly is seen paramount to moving ahead in making quantum computing a reality. Additional positive findings were error-reductions in the system due to the ability to control qubits individually when in proximity to each other. This brings quantum computing one step closer to complex computations involving entangled states.

Researchers in Japan have theoretically met the challenge of errors caused by noise in qubit production
Google’s Bristlecone Google has unveiled the purpose of its latest quantum computing processor, Bristlecone. For Google, though it doesn’t present the world with quantum supremacy,